In 1.33 beta, there are so many high level fortresses that sieging fortress has become strategically important. I have one suggestion for changes in Ver1.33, based on my observation and playing of the beta version. While it might make sense from a historical perspective, gameplay-wise with Venice being one of the first expansion paths, it does not make any sense at all. that comes to my mind is Austria taking Croatia which requires direct control and delays the follow up missions for Italy by 50+ years until HU is integrated/inherited. Particularly severe for PUs, where you cannot seize land as with vassals.Īn e.g.

If you have less opportunities to take key provinces for yourself, such self-blocking of missions will happen much more often. And issue I see with this change in general are missions: Some missions arbitrarily require you to hold land directly, while most allow non-tributary subjects holding the land for you. Regarding the CB changes: I somehow get it with the PU Casus Belli and to a lesser extend with the Subjugation Casus Belli, but for Independence and Flower War it seems to totally kill certain strategies / gameplays. Question: Will changing to the beta break saves from 1.32? It is not mentioned as usual in the OP and IIRC saves are mainly broken by map changes, still with all those coding changes I would assume it would be problematic here too.

Eu4 cream api 1.29